I think it shows it in its worst light, when others show examples it is OK I guess...
I guess I am more interested in the semantics given that other languages are far more useful to me (and interesting as well) thus interop matters if this will be used in JDK apis. Otherwise it is really hard to care. On Jun 1, 12:46 pm, Josh McDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > Ew, this reeks of "making the compiler-writer's job easy". There must be a > nicer solution, even within the narrow guidelines of the problem. Even > Obj-C's blocks are nicer than this (in Syntax at least). > > On 31 May 2010 15:58, Michael Neale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >http://www.baptiste-wicht.com/2010/05/oracle-pushes-a-first-version-o... > > > I guess most of the attention has been on the semantics (and rightly > > so) but wow... just wow. > > > (sorry to interupt the appleposse with java news). > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "The Java Posse" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups > > .com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." > > Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > - [email protected] > - http://twitter.com/sophistifunk > - http://flex.joshmcdonald.info/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
