On 8 Jun., 18:01, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote: > You're not entitled to your own facts, folks.
On 9 Jun., 07:24, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote: > The very title of this thread is "OS-X - the abandoned platform". It's not actually, in truth there's a question mark at the end. Need I elaborate on how that makes a difference? With kind regards Ben On 9 Jun., 07:24, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote: > The very title of this thread is "OS-X - the abandoned platform". If > only the world ran on cognitive dissonance. > > On Jun 8, 10:44 pm, Ben Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 8 Jun., 21:10, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote:> However, > > some hyperbole lovers claimed mac os x was now "abandonware", > > > and when people say silly things I feel compelled to call them on it. > > > Just FYI, you're the only person in the entire thread to use the word > > "abondonware" -- up until now anyways. At most people showed concern > > about a perceived neglect of OS X. > > > With kind regards > > Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
