On Jun 10, 9:44 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > Once again, Stephen Colebourne to the rescue? > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-dev/2010-June/001544.html > > I like it, reads much easier than the Strawman proposal (people > already have a hard enough time with bounds and co/contra-variance > without tossing the throws keyword in there).
Colebourne essentially proposes to deprecate checked exceptions. It will be a cool day in heck before that happens. Current discussion on the lambda mailing list suggests it may be possible to do without the throws keyword in a type parameter. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
