On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:52 PM, gafter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jun 10, 9:44 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Once again, Stephen Colebourne to the rescue? > > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-dev/2010-June/001544.html > > > > I like it, reads much easier than the Strawman proposal (people > > already have a hard enough time with bounds and co/contra-variance > > without tossing the throws keyword in there). > > Colebourne essentially proposes to deprecate checked exceptions. It > will be a cool day in heck before that happens. > 'Tis ok, us in Scalaland are already free. :) > > Current discussion on the lambda mailing list suggests it may be > possible to do without the throws keyword in a type parameter. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Viktor Klang | "A complex system that works is invariably | found to have evolved from a simple system | that worked." - John Gall Akka - the Actor Kernel: Akkasource.org Twttr: twitter.com/viktorklang -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
