On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 16:25, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > Of course, chances are you'll then reach a stage of frustration with > single-abstract-methods, and having to write getters on an immutable object > just to keep some 3rd party library (i.e. Spring) happy, and marshalling > exceptions through styles of abstraction that don't meet their original > design purpose. That's the stage when you start looking around for a > language that better fits your heightened awareness.
Isn't that because mostly the other libraries or frameworks bring in the obstacles? Maybe new languages become attractive in such cases is because new languages don't have those historical stack of frameworks expecting particular conventions? -- Martin Wildam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
