Lego Technic kits are usually from around 9 years and up, so at least we all agree that Scala is NOT for noobs. :)
On Aug 26, 2:04 pm, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote: > And Haskell is Mindstorms? ;-) > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Mario Fusco <[email protected]> wrote: > > I published my opinion on this argument here: > > >http://java.dzone.com/articles/scala-complex-yes-and > > > Anyway my advice is mostly to give a look at what Martin Odersky wrote > > about this debate: > > >http://lamp.epfl.ch/~odersky/blogs/isscalacomplex.html<http://lamp.epfl.ch/%7Eodersky/blogs/isscalacomplex.html> > > > I guess this could easily become the manifest of the Scala > > programmers. His arguments look quite similar to mine, but he > > presented them in a less complex and verbose (and somewhat more > > enjoyable) way. Could you expect something less from the father of > > Scala? :) > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "The Java Posse" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups > > .com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- > Viktor Klang, > Code Connoisseur > Work: www.akkasource.com > Code: github.com/viktorklang > Follow: twitter.com/viktorklang > Read: klangism.tumblr.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
