That argument that fashion is a necessity and thus unpatentable sounds a bit broken given a lot/most "modern" medicines are still patented and expensive. IMHO I prefer to think that fashion (leaving out clothes with extra ordinary functions like fire/waterproofing abilities) is not logical and there is nothing to patent, when most year to year fashions merely change colour, print or arrangement or recycling of past designs.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
