-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/9/10 08:30 , Karsten Silz wrote: > This may also be the final nail in the JavaFX coffin. I remember > hearing that JavaFX really needs Java modularity for quick > start-up time on the desktop and in mobile to compete effectively > against Flash. Yes, but this refers to a end-customer deployment. Industrial deployments are fine as they are already fine today with regular JSE. Of course, one might ask why an industrial customer would switch to JavaFX, but this could be - at least in some cases - the effect of Oracle marketing. So, I'd rather re-phrase your statement as "this makes really harm to end-user targeting of Java/JavaFX". Which is sad, anyway.
- -- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people [email protected] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyIgv8ACgkQeDweFqgUGxcDjACcDLCb78qvuj+hBmPIgIplEMB4 //EAnjpmu4riRQF/MtmFBxYHHvhHoWba =HlVQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
