On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Liam Knox <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would also argue against the DSL's to a point. Again if you look at the > larger picture DSL's can exponentially increase the surface areas in > projects, yet another mini language to understand and often implemented by > people who have little experience in this area. > > My only caveat to that complaint, is often the developer should understand the "mini-language" anyway. Assuming the "domain" is the domain of the company the developer is working for. It appears to me, that there is often too much disconnect between the domain language used when talking about what a product should do, and the implementation language that is used to make it happen. Trying to unify the two seems a very reasonable goal. Especially if you want someone to understand why something was done later. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
