I like the idea but its not what I see that happens in practice at least in
the financial sector.  You rarely see the same modelling applied by 2
systems even for very common aspects such as trades, cashflows or accounts.
 Partly this is due to lack of attempt to synegize and time to market, but
often its as much that there are fundamental different views and
requirements in different systems.  When you expand that to a whole sector
you then see its massively more complex.

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Josh Berry <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Liam Knox <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I would also argue against the DSL's to a point.   Again if you look at
>> the larger picture DSL's can exponentially increase the surface areas in
>> projects, yet another mini language to understand and often implemented by
>> people who have little experience in this area.
>>
>>
>
> My only caveat to that complaint, is often the developer should understand
> the "mini-language" anyway.  Assuming the "domain" is the domain of the
> company the developer is working for.  It appears to me, that there is often
> too much disconnect between the domain language used when talking about what
> a product should do, and the implementation language that is used to make it
> happen.  Trying to unify the two seems a very reasonable goal.  Especially
> if you want someone to understand why something was done later.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to