I especially like the way that the fourth paragraph refers to "the conceptual complexity of using it (java)" followed almost immediately by "it is deliberately simple"
I'm not certain how to best interpret this, but there is an impression here that Java is "deliberately simple" in the same sense as some computer helpdesks, or government paperwork. So the phrase carries a double-edged meaning. Overall, I'm in general agreement with the article, and feel that it captures some important points. Although I fear that the title may be too easily misinterpreted, especially if you don't read the body text... http://john.freml.in/scala-is-not-a-better-java <http://john.freml.in/scala-is-not-a-better-java> -- Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
