This observation is irrelevant unless you meant that choice of language has absolutely no bearing on the likelyhood that your code ends up readable, which I find hard to swallow.
On Sep 18, 9:58 am, Steel City Phantom <[email protected]> wrote: > >gs/write/read/p > >Reading code is far, far more important than writing it. > >Perhaps we should redefine the acronym WORA to be "write once, read > >anytime" and use it as a mantra for source code development? (Except > >that Sun, now Oracle, probably has a copyright, trademark or patent on > >WORA.) > > wow, you really think its the languages fault you can't read old code? one > of the best coders i have ever met was a perl guy. perl is notorious for > being hard to read but you opened one of his scripts and it read like a > really good spy novel. its not the language that makes code hard to read, > its the moron that wrote it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
