I'd say AWT+Swing consititute more than 1% of the code that's in the Java libraries and the JVM, but haven't measured this.
2010/9/22 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> > > > 2010/9/22 Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> > > By the way, the point that I wanted to make is that Java developers who >>> decide to learn Android are never really handicapped by the Java aspect >>> (which is 99% compatible with Java SE). >>> >>> False. If you have some code for the manipulation of images, just to >> make an example, you're killed and you have to rewrite everything. It has >> been already said and it's a matter of facts, so I don't see the point in >> continuously denying it. > > > What part of "99%" did you miss? :-) > > Look on the Android forums and compare the number of people who complain > about Android "not being Java" and the number people asking Android API > questions. I'm guessing 99.99% is probably more accurate... > > -- > Cédric > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
