Actually, I should temper my statement now I've read this: http://fxexperience.com/
The best part... 'we're hiring' and a list of positions. That alone is different to what has happened the past few years. Hope springs eternal. On Sep 22, 9:53 am, Steven Herod <[email protected]> wrote: > So, JavaFX Script is dead, long live JavaFX. > > On the plus side, there are a heap of good things about this. It > stops the 'why the new language' debates, it means people with > enthusiasm for Groovy/Scala/Java will get on board with the API, > tooling deficiencies will go away (if you stick with Java), we solve > some inter-operability issues between java/javafx, yada yada yada. > > On the downside, its September 2010, JavaFX was released this time 2 > years ago, it's going to be 'the second half of 2011' before 2.0 is > released. And if they deliver like the have over the past 2 years. > Well, I believe it when I see it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
