I thought that was already established, given the overly-broad attack on Android... and essentially everyone else producing VM's. It's a bit scary what it could amount to: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-oracle-has-not-learned-about-open-source/7417
On Sep 24, 8:53 pm, Robert Casto <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.marketwatch.com/story/oracle-shares-dip-after-ceos-remarks... > > I saw this and it sure sounded like it to me. I can understand wanting to > own more of the hardware capabilities to build better database hardware for > enterprises. But that is not what Ellison said. They want to own more of the > intellectual property which means what? > > -- > Robert Castowww.robertcasto.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
