I guess this just makes that conclusion more apparent. I don't see Oracle changing their ways though. Not when their present modus operondi has gotten them this far. They have most of the top companies using their wares and the lock in is pretty deep.
Why play with everyone else where you have to be considerate of others. Create your own playground, make all the rules, and invite everyone else to come play. So far it would seem the Fortune 100 are happy to abide by Oracle's playground rules. On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought that was already established, given the overly-broad attack > on Android... and essentially everyone else producing VM's. It's a bit > scary what it could amount to: > > http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-oracle-has-not-learned-about-open-source/7417 > > > On Sep 24, 8:53 pm, Robert Casto <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.marketwatch.com/story/oracle-shares-dip-after-ceos-remarks... > > > > I saw this and it sure sounded like it to me. I can understand wanting to > > own more of the hardware capabilities to build better database hardware > for > > enterprises. But that is not what Ellison said. They want to own more of > the > > intellectual property which means what? > > > > -- > > Robert Castowww.robertcasto.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Robert Casto www.robertcasto.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
