On Oct 5, 11:52 am, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tired of Kevin's bazillion attempt to rehash the same old discussion,
> even after Dick asked for some rest? Chrome user?
>
> Have no fear! This plugin will hide everything he 
> writes:http://dl.dropbox.com/u/368812/HideKW.crx
>
> You can uninstall it from the extensions page (Window - Extensions).
>
> NB: Credit goes to Casper Bang. I merely changed a name.
>
> On Oct 5, 10:59 am, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Given the range of alternate languages available on the Java platform, and
> > the quality of tooling for these, it now seems reasonable that developers
> > could have more freedom to choose the language they work with based on their
> > needs:
>
> > e.g.
> > groovy for small in-house apps needed quickly
> > jruby for web development
> > scala/clojure for financial work
> > etc.
>
> > By targeting the JVM, many traditional concerns over changing languages take
> > on far less significance; such as the need for a new infrastructure, lack of
> > in-house operations knowledge and integration with an existing codebase.
>
> > With the agile and software craftsmanship movements already empowering
> > develops to make more decisions over process and planning (and to take
> > responsibility for these), does it now make sense to also put more control
> > over the choice of language into the hands of the people who will actually
> > be using it?
>
> > Of course, there will be management concerns.  It's important to be able to
> > hire future developers, and fragmentation could occur if multiple teams each
> > chose a different language.  On the other hand, are these
> > considerations fundamentally different when choosing libraries such as
> > hibernate, spring, lambdaj or lombok, or when choosing testng in preference
> > to lombok?  and is code reuse in many organisations really high enough that
> > you can't already claim the codebases of different projects are fragmented?
> >  In truth, is the suffering all that great where we *already* use different
> > languages for parts of a system (SQL and javascript anyone...)?
>
> > Where is the balance here?  Is it really still acceptable, in this day and
> > age, for management to mandate that "though shalt use Java, and only Java"?
>
> > --
> > Kevin Wright
>
> > mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected]
> > pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright
> > twitter: @thecoda

....but....but....I kind of like Kevin.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to