Firstly, I am fine with Pizza. I haven't observed an organisation of any given size which has given the programmers total freedom. I think it would be interesting to see how that would go.
I think that it can be part of human nature that if someone demonstrates great trust in you then you would tend not to want to let them down or mess up. There is the philosophical argument that people can end up becoming what they are treated as being i.e. if they are always treated as not being able to be trusted would that affect the way that they develop? On Oct 5, 1:12 pm, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually... I may have answered my own question in the OP. > > Most organisations already have a process for choosing what libraries they > use (e.g. SpringMVC vs Struts or GWT) > > What if the choice of language was on completely equal footing here? So > whatever power developers have to influence and suggest the adoption of a > library, they should be granted *exactly* the same means to influence the > choice of language. As a rule-of-thumb it feels like it should adapt well > to many firms. > > Could it possibly be that simple? > > -- > Kevin Wright > > mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] > pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright > twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
