If Apple would open-source their changes, or sell them to Oracle under a closed source licence, that would be wunderbar.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Jan Goyvaerts™ <[email protected]> wrote: > Lot's of "IF" in this thread. :-) > I'm not making a prediction, but my own "if" is: I would really be surprised > if no Java will be shipped to Mac the time JDK7 is ready. > Apple was just the last big company missing in the JDK debate. Let's let the > dust settle. I'm sure the bottom line will be that everybody will have Java. > Mac included. > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:05, Carl Jokl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If there is no client side Java then the money being spent of JavaFX >> is kind of waisted unless Mac O/S is just ignored. >> >> Can I just glare are Joe at this point *glare* *glare* *glare* >> *you...you and all your kind...* >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
