Reminds me a lot of Nintendo, in that they want to be in completely charge
of distribution ( they did by being the only one allowed to manufacture
carts) and the fiasco that was the green blood in Mortal Kombat.

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Fabrizio Giudici <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Read and laugh:
>
>
> http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/apples-mac-app-store-review-guidelines-posted-will-photoshop/
>
> *2.2 Apps that exhibit bugs will be rejected
> **2.14 Apps must be packaged and submitted using Apple's packaging
> technologies included in Xcode - no third party installers allowed
> **2.19 Apps that require license keys or implement their own copy
> protection will be rejected.
> **2.20 Apps that present a license screen at launch will be rejected
> **2.21 Apps may not use update mechanisms outside of the App Store
> **6.2 Apps that look similar to Apple Products or apps bundled on the Mac,
> including the Finder, iChat, iTunes, and Dashboard, will be rejected.
> **6.3 Apps that do not use system provided items, such as buttons and
> icons, correctly and as described in the Apple Macintosh Human Interface
> Guidelines <
> https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/XHIGIntro/XHIGIntro.html>
> will be rejected.
> **7.6 In general, the more expensive your app, the more thoroughly we will
> review it.*
> *11.1 Apps portraying realistic images of people or animals being killed or
> maimed, shot, stabbed, tortured or injured will be rejected
> **11.3 "Enemies" within the context of a game cannot solely target a
> specific race, culture, a real government or corporation, or any other real
> entity
> **11.5 Apps that include games of Russian roulette will be rejected.
>
>
> *
>
> So, rule 2.2 states that only Chuck Norris will be able to submit apps.
> Other 2.x rules and 6.3 state that any major product from Microsoft, Adobe
> and others will be rejected. Rules 6.2 says that Apple doesn't like
> competition (and I'm curious to see whether it's legal or not).
> Rules 11.x, while could be ok with my personal ethics, say that we're in a
> serious freedom of speach issue.
>
> --
> Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
> Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
> java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
> [email protected]
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
mP

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to