It's probably the UI stuff that's costly and impairs their ability to surprise/innovate. So how about d) they still maintain a private, headless version requiring minimal effort on their part.
On Oct 24, 7:02 pm, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I wrong or there has be no mention for Lion Server? Which makes me > thing of the following: > > 1. Apple has deprecated Java > 2. As it has been recalled in previous threads, WebObjects runs on Java > 3. Apple runs its service backend on WebObjects > > This necessarily implies a big change in how Apple will run its service > backend: > > a. either Apple knows that Oracle steps in for providing Java on Mac OS X > b. or they're ready to move off WebObjects for something not based on Java > c. or they are going to run their services on something else than Mac OS X. > > Option c) sounds a bit strange to me because they don't want to depend > on others' technologies... > > -- > f.g. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
