This class appears to be an Android class, NOT a Harmony/Apache class http://www.netmite.com/android/mydroid/1.6/dalvik/libcore/support/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/security/tests/support/cert/PolicyNodeImpl.java (package org.apache.harmony.security.tests.support.cert;)
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot/jdk/raw-file/00cd9dc3c2b5/src/share/classes/sun/security/provider/certpath/PolicyNodeImpl.java (package sun.security.provider.certpath;) The distinction is VERY important to the credibility of Apache and Harmony! Note also the explicit Harmony contribution rules: http://harmony.apache.org/get-involved.html Stephen On Oct 28, 10:18 pm, Craig Kelley <[email protected]> wrote: > Also note the absence of generics in the Apache version. This is > something you would lose, coming from a class file. > > On Oct 28, 2:49 pm, markmahieu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The Android version looks strikingly like code that's been decompiled > > from a class file, to me. All local variables seem to use naming > > that's very formulaic, and unusual for a Java developer to choose > > (with such consistency anyway). Then there's the fact that the > > ANY_POLICY constant is defined, but the literal is used in the code > > instead. I've seen decompilers create the slight differences in loop > > styles too. > > > Most curious. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
