On 10/29/2010 04:00 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Fabrizio Giudici
<[email protected]> wrote:
3. Would be the FSF entitled for asking to release the whole Harmony under
the GPL (+CPE) license? In cascade, wouldn't be Google forced to do the
same? And, this is my point, couldn't be this the strategy by Oracle
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anybody has to ask. The
Apache License gives permission to fork under any license, right? For
that matter since Android is Apache-licensed, if that's what Oracle
was after, then why don't they just fork it?
Because I don't think they are searching for a fork - they want to
control it as a part of Java.
--
f.g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
