Thank you for your comments David.

I am definitely in favour of Java 7.1 being a full JSR (and should
have said so in my post) and not for forking the code base.

On Nov 5, 7:20 am, robogeek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 4, 4:55 pm, "[email protected]"
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm really happy that we will be getting a new release of Java
> > (relatively soon).
>
> > That said, there are some things that I wanted to see in Java 7 that
> > have been delayed until 8, so does anyone else think that a Java 7.1
> > release would be a good idea?
>
> > I'd like to see included...
>
> > 1) Collection literals (so finish up project coin)
> > 2) Date and Time API (JSR 310)
> > 3) Annotation support (JSR 308)
> > 4) Maybe a small subset of JSR 305, static analysis annotations (like
> > @CheckReturnValue)
> > 5) Throw in the Date picker
> > 6) The Swing application framework
> > 7) Perhaps some better integration with JavaFX 2.0
>
> Except ...
>
> Changing the platform definition only happens when a "Platform JSR"
> goes through the system.
>
> Remember that Su..er..Oracle's implementation of Java is only one
> implementation of Java.  The other Java implementors also have to be
> involved to agree with changes to the platform definition.  The
> changes you're listing are changes to the platform definition.
>
> Most especially is your mention of JavaFX as that was never taken to
> the JCP for definition through any JSR.
>
> That's all according to the current process.  Platform JSR's are for
> major version number increments of the Java platform definition.
> Maybe the process could be changed to have different levels of
> platform definition change for a 7.1, or maybe not.  But the process
> to get the process changed could take awhile.
>
> Theoretically with OpenJDK one could produce a fork of it that
> contains all the things you say (except for the JavaFX bits since that
> isn't open source).  But because it diverges from the specified
> platform it wouldn't be eligable to be called "Java" until the JCP
> does its thing with a platform JSR.
>
> + David Herronhttp://davidherron.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to