On 11/20/2010 12:58 AM, Jo Voordeckers wrote:
Funny that you think of JavaFX having to do with the bad performance,
actually the tweetwall inside the cinema rooms with 3d animation at
1920x800 was done with the experimental JavaFX (1.3.1) prism stack,
both rocksolid stable and only a CPU usage of 10%
Jo, I'm a long-time JavaFX supporter (I'm not a Flash supporter, but I'm
neither a basher of it) - in my quoted sentence there was some subtle
degree of irony. I was just pointing out that people that in the past
continuously pointed out problems with JavaFX and Flash (not necessarily
performance problems: I'm referring to anything that can ruin the user
experience) and currently praise HTML 5 as the real working solution,
seem to get the same "forgiving" attitude with respect to faults of
their preferred technology.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
