Were they *obliged* to vote for then ? I'm afraid that objecting against but in the end voting for is the same as not objecting...
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 14:11, CKoerner <[email protected]> wrote: > Java 7 and 8 specification passed under protest > > " For example, Credit Suisse noted that "the current battle around > licensing term, however, reveals that Java never actually was an open > standard. FOU restrictions clearly discriminate open source > implementations and prevent competition, and with that, innovation in > that space" > > > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Java-7-and-8-specification-passed-under-protest-1148489.html > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
