Since Oracle took over things have changed in my opinion. What to think about the members' objectivity - of those who are now customers of the new owner of Java ? I'm not accusing anyone, but it is a fact some of the members are now commercially related to Oracle. And therefore can't be called impartial any more. Even if they do behave as such.
Or am I besides the point ? On Dec 7, 2010, at 14:56, Miroslav Pokorny <[email protected]> wrote: How did Credit Suisse become a member of the JCP ? I assumed from their name they are a bank, and as such produce a lot of inhouse custom software but very little software for everyone else. For me this should disqualify them, as their motives become purely selfish while a company or group, doing foss or selling software is actually part of the mainstream and not so focused. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
