On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Karsten Silz <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Dec 13, 7:13 pm, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Apple encourages you to think of the iPad as a different device, not > > > just a blown-up iPhone, and decided to implement it with different UI > > > controls. > > > > The same could be said of Java ME: "Java ME encourages you to think of > all > > phones as a different device for which you should write specific code". > > In the grand scheme of things, Java ME just ran on phones. For me, > the iPad is not just a big phone, both in usage and UI, so citing the > iPad as an example of more fragmentation is like saying that > Silverlight is fragmented because you have to write applications > differently for Windows Phone 7 and a Windows PC. > That's a good example of playing on the meaning of words. The bottom line remains that you need to write two different versions of your code for the iPhone and the iPad. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
