For 25+ years now I have been a strong advocate of starting with a > dynamic language (Scheme, Miranda (now Haskell), Groovy, Python) > followed rapidly by a compiled language (C++, D, Java) followed by > another language from the dynamic group followed by another language > form the static group. At the end of this one of C or C++ must have > been covered. In the second half of this students must cover assembly > language programming as well.
Since when has Haskell been dynamic? Hindley and Milner would *not* be amused to hear that... -- Kevin Wright gtalk / msn : [email protected] <[email protected]>mail: [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
