I can't speak to Beans Binding, but a fork of SAF named BSAF (Better Swing 
Application Framework) is alive and well:

http://kenai.com/projects/bsaf/pages/Home

I'm working on my own port that focuses on automatically making apps look and 
behave like first class citizens on Mac OS and taking advantage of all the cool 
Apple JDK features that make your app look native.

The two main use cases I have in mind are :

1. People that want to write native-looking desktop apps specifically for the 
Mac in Java.
2. Java developers without much experience on the Mac UI can write their Java 
app as normal on Windows/Linux, and when deployed on Mac many OS X features 
will be automatically utilized without any extra work on their part.

I have budgeted a lot more free time in 2011 so I'll be able to make 
significant progress on my own project.

But for now you can use BSAF as a drop-in replacement for SAF.


Rob

On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Casper Bang wrote:

>> BeansBinding is not abandoned. It's still widely used by many people and
>> the NetBeans IDE supports it. The moron who forked it failed so far to
>> keep the forked project active, but maybe a call for people could push
>> things...
> 
> Well I am of course talking about the original Beans Binding
> (JSR-295), as well as it's sister project Swing App Framework
> (JSR-296) which depends on it. Perhaps your definition of abandoned
> differs from mine, but most people checking the mailing-lists would
> come to the same conclusion as I: 
> https://beansbinding.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectMailingListList
> 
> Are you saying NetBeans supports a fork of JSR-295? It's clear from
> the disclaimer, that NetBeans 7 won't support (the unfinished!) Swing
> App Framework for much longer: "Note that JSR-296 (Swing Application
> Framework) is no longer developed and will not become part of the
> official Java Development Kit as was originally planned. You can still
> use the Swing Application Framework library as it is, but no further
> development is expected."
> 
> 
>> BTW, it's possible to move forward and use DCI in place of MVC:
>> 
>> http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.htmlhttp://wiki.apidesign.org/wiki/DCI
>> 
>> --
>> Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
>> Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
>> java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici -www.tidalwave.it/people
>> [email protected]
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to