I suppose if each element of the loop writes a different file containing just the index, that's safely parallelisable and a case it would be difficult to automatically analyse.
These things often err on the conservative side, so as to not introduce problems. 2011/1/6 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>: > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Ricky Clarkson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> All it takes is for the compiler to know what operations are >> side-effect-ful and it can do all the necessary analysis. > > It's still not enough: the loop might still be parallelizable even though > it's performing side effect operations. > >> >> So, for instance, it's perfectly doable without any hints for Haskell > > Are you sure? Remember: the only important factor here is whether the > operations can be safely performed out of order. > -- > Cédric > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
