Why, are there some inaccurate judgements you might otherwise make about Java based on those two classes?
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 13 January 2011 13:36, Ricky Clarkson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'm a bit confused as to why Scala programmers have the gall to claim >> > the >> > moral high ground in regards to multi-core programming. >> >> The confusion is in your head. Scala programmers don't claim that high >> ground. >> >> > For example, scala has enshrined foldLeft and foldRight forever more as >> > core >> > language, by importing both of those by default as operators (i.e. "/:", >> > as >> > a token, is a fold operator in scala unless you go out of your way to >> > unimport it). >> >> Let's rewrite that without the emotional crap: "Scala has foldLeft and >> foldRight (and symbolic versions of those) in the standard library." >> Yes, it does, but so what? >> > > Java has java.util.Data and java.util.Calendar. So I think that's enough > said about judging a language based on classes and methods that just so > happen to be defined some standard library, yes? > > -- > Kevin Wright > > gtalk / msn : [email protected] > mail: [email protected] > vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright > twitter: @thecoda > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
