On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 17:44 +0000, Kevin Wright wrote: [ . . . ] > > No way is that happening, parallel arrays were the primary driver for > closures in java. Until we get closures, all bets are off...
ParallelDoubleArray in extra166y works fine for me with anonymous classes. It being Java, it's verbose and ugly, but it works -- no need to wait for closures at all. I agree it would be better to have closures than not have them. Of course the JVM is not Java, which is why GPars, Scalaz, and Clojure already have parallel map so that applications targeting the JVM can have all these nice parallelism goodies today -- without having to wait for the (potentially mythical :-) Java 7. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
