What you're describing is a trademark then, not a patent. If it's a patent, then it's about the very concept of an app store, which is yet another modern IP/software/business model patent absurdity.
Alexey 2001 Honda CBR600F4i (CCS) 1996 Honda RS125 (CCS) 2002 Suzuki Bandit 1200S http://azinger.blogspot.com http://bsheet.sourceforge.net http://wcollage.sourceforge.net ________________________________ From: Moandji Ezana <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, January 12, 2011 10:23:06 AM Subject: Re: [The Java Posse] Apple patents App Stores You mean they trademarked "App Store". In my limited understanding, that means others can make app stores, but can't call them that, whereas "patenting App Stores" would mean others couldn't make app stores. I may be wrong. Moandji On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Vince O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: Microsoft opposes move. > >http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12173224 > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The >Java Posse" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected]. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
