According to this article, Mueller is a sensationalist liar, and if anything 
he found a strong suggestion that Google didn't steal anything of note*.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/burnette/oops-no-copied-java-code-or-weapons-of-mass-destruction-found-in-android/2162


*) This post, and the earlier one from Mueller, is all about the unspecified 
"copyrights" claim that was tacked onto the primary patents-based suit that 
Oracle has brought against Google. If this zdnet article can be taken as 
'proof' that so far nobody has found any serious copyright infringement, 
then the sheer amount of time that has passed is a strong suggestion that 
there's no copyright issue here. This doesn't make the suit go away, it's 
now down to the list of 8 patents. In my personal opinion, these patents are 
ridiculously broad and, if they can be used against google successfully, 
they can be used just as well against Opera, Firefox, and Apple (for 
Safari). But that's just my opinion. I'm certainly not a lawyer.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to