Quite.

If Oracle is after a set license fee per android device sold, then these 
copyright infringements are not going to get Oracle anywhere close to that - 
Google wasn't actually using this code in the first place, and it isn't on 
any existing phones out there either (i.e. Oracle won't get some sort of 
deal where they get a set amount of money per android phone out in the 
wild). See this is a case where some company by accident stripped copyright 
off of some *OPEN SOURCE* file and posted it on their website. If that means 
Google is going to end up being millions of dollars to Oracle, I'll claim 
here and now that we'll see a mad scrambling to check all nooks and crannies 
of all websites in an attempt to leech millions from tons of companies that 
no doubt accidentally did the same thing. i.e. I don't believe *AT ALL* this 
is going to lead to a big cash payout for Oracle, and thus I'd say if these 
are all the breaches that were found, Oracle might as well scrap 'copyright 
stuff' from their case.

NB: One reason Google does not want to pay a per-install fee is that the 
entire Android model just doesn't work that way. Google is reporting Android 
activations for a reason - they have no clue how many android installs there 
are. If you want to flash a nexus one with a new version, you can do that. 
If you want to flash an iPhone 2G with android, you can do that too. Google 
doesn't (want to) know that you're doing this. Want to make an e-reader 
based on android? Making 100,000 units? Google doesn't need to know. Thus, 
paying a set fee per install to Oracle isn't just a case of a lot of money, 
it would also mean that simply downloading the android core is no longer 
possible without registering your intents with google.

NB2: Unless you live in the US, there is absolutely no snowball's chance in 
hell that accidentally hosting an already open source file with the wrong 
headers is going to lead to a lot of legal pain for you. If you are notified 
and you fix it (i.e. stop hosting it) within a reasonable timeframe, you 
should be fine. DISCLAIMER: I am not a lawyer. (Even in the US I doubt 
you're going to get nailed to the cross for it, but then again in the US the 
legal system for this sort of thing is principally a farce, as you can win 
almost any case by throwing enough money at it).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to