More FUD, Java 7 was delayed for JCP political reasons.

Kirk

On Jan 26, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Vince O'Sullivan wrote:

> It looks to me like a reasonable description of the current state of
> the Java platform.
>   • Oracle will direct Java innovation...
>   Java innovation under Sun was rapidly running out of steam with
> version 7 was being
>   repeatedly delayed and the new functionality reduced.  Such new
> functionality as is
>   being added to Java is no longer market leading but market catch-
> up.  Oracle can't do worse.
>   • OpenJDK is not fully open.
>   I'm no open source expert but even I can see that a fully open
> source version of Java has yet to be delivered.
>   • The JCP is dying.
>   Dead, I would say although perhaps undead is a more appropriate
> description since is has
>   become so animated recently.
>   • Competition will shift to frameworks.
>   Yep.
>   • Fewer young developers will learn Java first.
>   Java's greatest strength comes from it currently being the lingua
> franca of software development but it's
>   declining rapidly on the client and there are many better languages
> around for beginners.
> 
> As mentioned in previous answers, there are several things that he
> left out but the stuff he did mention is a reasonable (thought not by
> any means the only) take on the current state of play.
> 
> Which parts of the article do you think are FUD?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to