On 02/09/2011 11:10 PM, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
So you turn these n little commits into a bigger one and you push it.
It becomes a second nature once you get used to this kind of flow.
Thanks for the detailed explanation. So, yes, as I thought git renaming
is the same thing as hg "squash commit", as the "mq extension" (which is
NOT a plugin today, in the sense that it's already embedded in the hg
code, just need to activate it in the configuration) allows to
manipulate in several ways the "queue" of local commits, including
merging several commits into a single one before pushing. I agree that
it's a very important feature. So, hg is not less than git even in this
respect.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
