On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Nick Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, parallelization is only a special type of concurrency (at least as > the terms are used in the software engineering discipline > Well, very few people like these words, to be honest, and parallelism and concurrency are pretty much used interchangeably these days. Going against this is a bit like trying to convince the world that "hacking" doesn't mean "illegally breaking into". I'm curious, though: if parallelization is one type of concurrency, what are the other types? -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
