lol, yea, its working as expected. Crashing and buggy. They rushed it and it shows, you can argue compilation semantics or whatever, end result speaks for itself.
http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/05/ipad-2-xoom-fight/# On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 3:28:53 PM UTC-4, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Chris Koerner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If the source wasn't in good enough shape then I don't think its >> unreasonable to believe that the compiled binary robustness might >> be tenuous, unless you think they just haven't put enough inline comments. > > > Really? I find this statement a bit naive... > > The code is working as expected but when you are talking about API's > exposed in an entire operating system, it's not very hard for me to imagine > that there might be a lot of pieces that need to be refactored and > documented before I want to expose them to hundreds of thousands of > developers. There are also parts that you will want to remove or obfuscate, > you will need to create a specific OS distribution, transfer from one repo > to another, etc... > > Deciding to ship the product first and then the source second sounds > perfectly natural to me. > > -- > Cédric > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
