On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Ricky Clarkson <[email protected]> wrote: >> So then the question becomes: What features are compelling that java does >> not have? > > Fun, really. It should be more fun to write code in than Java is.
It is also just plain fun when the algorithm you are implementing is more visible in the code you are writing. Getting lost in the language such that you can't see the algorithm you implemented is far far from fun. I still think askng what will be the next Java is the same as asking what will be the next McDonalds. It isn't like the next one will replace the old one. (I think by my own argument, one could already say that there have been next Javas, unless you limit it to the JVM maybe.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
