On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Fabrizio Giudici <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 02:51 PM, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Does this work? It looks like the compiler should be able to optimize
>> this.
>>
>> Funny, eh? Frankly, I was unaware of the inlining problem (or I forgot
> about it). After reading the stuff, I'd say the same as you, that the
> compiler should optimize out anyway, but it indeed works.
Indeed:
int n = null != null ? 0 : 1;
public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
Code:
* 0: aconst_null*
* 1: ifnull 8*
4: iconst_0
5: goto 9
8: iconst_1
9: istore_1
10: return
}
Amazing, and disappointing too. If javac misses that, what else is it
missing?
--
Cédric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
