2011/6/22 Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> > On 06/22/2011 03:14 PM, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote: > >> Amazing, and disappointing too. If javac misses that, what else is it >> missing? >> > OTOH, I'm wondering whether this is irrelevant from the performance > perspective as the JIT will optimize it correctly...
Probably (although I'm not sure, since it's a one time initialization, isn't it exactly what a JIT would not bother with?), but it's such an easy peephole optimization (constant expression) that I would think this kind of thing would be in the 1.0 version of a compiler... -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
