On 23 June 2011 23:29, Chris Adamson <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at the TSS article, I'm surprised it took over an hour for the > personal attacks to show up in the comments. I remember the OSGi > community being much quicker to anger than that. > > On Jun 23, 4:22 pm, phil swenson <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.theserverside.com/news/2240037102/OSGi-Not-Easy-Enough-to-... > > > > "We have changed our views on OSGi over the years, and one of the > > reasons for that is that OSGi simply cannot be made as easy to use and > > as productive as we feel is consistent with Spring values." > > > > "Niche" >
OSGi *is* tricky to get right, that much is true. But... You need the right tools to get there, and it would seem that Spring simply doesn't have what it takes, that's hardly OSGi's fault though! Have a talk from OSGi & Eclipse specialist Neil Bartlett at JavaWUG, it's rather good. He explains matters more clearly than I could: http://skillsmatter.com/podcast/java-jee/scala-modules -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
