Well, all the opponents of OSGi that are pointing at Jigsaw as the "simpler alternative" are seemilngly missing the obvious fact that Jigsaw is still largely unknown quantity in the modularization world.
Nobody has any actual real world exposure to building real modular and extensible applications with it and there is no telling what kind of problems are people going to get themselves into when jigsaw hits the fan... reede, 24. juuni 2011 19:25.14 UTC+3 kirjutas JessHolle: > > But that still leaves open the question as to whether the right solution > is to provide more tooling for OSGi or something simpler and possibly > better integrated with the language, e.g. Jigsaw. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/lM-SRAw0jssJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
