In the no-transfer scenario, what happens in an acquisition? The patent is just invalidated?
2011/8/9 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Non-transferable is even worse. That does absolutely nothing to the patent >> trolls but hurts the very rare Joe Inventor quite a bit. You can buy a >> company and leave that company intact, injecting whatever lawyer power you >> need for that company to start the court cases. > > Do explain. Let's say there is a 3 year deadline and no transfer right. A > company or an inventor comes up with an idea and patents it. > How does a patent troll take advantage of that patent? > -- > Cédric > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
