On Sep 12, 10:05 pm, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Ben Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12 Sep., 21:32, clay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A closure is when you define a function that "closes" over the local > > > environment from which the new function is defined and can access > > > local variables of that defining scope. > > Not just local variables, anything denotable from the enclosing scope, > > such as the method equals(Object), which happens to have a different > > meaning inside the "closure" than outside. This is a contradiction of > > your very definition ("a closure is a function which closes over the > > [lexically enclosing] environment") and thus disproves your > > hypothesis. > > q.e.d. > > Technically true but practically irrelevant. > > Jave has indeed had closures since day one (e.g. Runnable, Callable, > etc...). If you're not convinced, ask yourself the following question: is > there any programming construct that you will be able to do in Java 8 with > closure support that you can't do today with Runnable? > > None. right, java 7 is already turing complete :)
> > The syntax will be nicer, but that's all Java 8 is adding in that area. > > -- > Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
