What, therefore, does this imply for Java8 support/availability on Linux?
On 12 October 2011 10:27, Martijn Verburg <[email protected]> wrote: > The initial thoughts were Java 8, but I think it's fair to say that further > input from the other OpenJDK members and the community was requested before > it's set in concrete. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2011, Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Have they announced how the runtime would be integrated into the JRE? > > At one point they said it would be part of a Java 7 update, but I've > > since heard they were going to wait until Java 8 (now 2013) to include > > JavaFX in the JRE. I wasn't sure how reliable the rumor was though. > > > > > > On Oct 3, 4:34 pm, Simon Ochsenreither > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Maybe I completely missed it, but the website now offers a JavaFX 2 SDK > >> (without "Beta") and it seems like it wasn't announced anywhere. > >> > >> The most notable change seems to be that the code will be open-sourced > and > >> contributed to OpenJDK. > >> > >> Any idea what's happening here? > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
