That's cool. I cried foul on the lack of open-sourcing *before* I bemoaned the lack of a Linux distribution :)
On 12 October 2011 11:21, Martijn Verburg <[email protected]> wrote: > To add to this (sorry for the add-on posts today), I think this is a > powerful reason to open source this ASAP. That way a bunch of vendors > and community members can work with Oracle to hit some of these > platforms earlier. Oracle does actually have limited resources, > despite what some people might think :-). > > M > > On 12 October 2011 11:18, Martijn Verburg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I believe that they'll try to hit that yes (they demoed it working on > > an Android device) - but this definitely isn't set in stone yet. They > > polled the community as to what platforms they wanted supported, and > > of course everyone said "All of them" ;-). Well not quite, but I > > think iOS, Mac OS X and Linux (and therefore Android) were popular > > choices (yes Kirk, Solaris too ;p). > > > > M > > > > On 12 October 2011 10:34, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What, therefore, does this imply for Java8 support/availability on > Linux? > >> > >> On 12 October 2011 10:27, Martijn Verburg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> The initial thoughts were Java 8, but I think it's fair to say that > >>> further input from the other OpenJDK members and the community was > requested > >>> before it's set in concrete. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Martijn > >>> > >>> On Wednesday, 12 October 2011, Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > Have they announced how the runtime would be integrated into the JRE? > >>> > At one point they said it would be part of a Java 7 update, but I've > >>> > since heard they were going to wait until Java 8 (now 2013) to > include > >>> > JavaFX in the JRE. I wasn't sure how reliable the rumor was though. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Oct 3, 4:34 pm, Simon Ochsenreither > >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> Maybe I completely missed it, but the website now offers a JavaFX 2 > SDK > >>> >> (without "Beta") and it seems like it wasn't announced anywhere. > >>> >> > >>> >> The most notable change seems to be that the code will be > open-sourced > >>> >> and > >>> >> contributed to OpenJDK. > >>> >> > >>> >> Any idea what's happening here? > >>> > > >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
