coffeescript's approach just seems more pragmatic. compiles to javascript - works on everything. plus it's simply a cleaner, nicer syntax.
it doesn't pass the "cool" test. it looks like a rehashed java. my gut says dart fails to get any uptake. 2011/10/11 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Serge Boulay <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The more interesting question will be whether Apple, MS, Mozilla will >> embed the Dart VM in their browsers. >> > This is where the dual approach (generate Javascript or run on a VM) is > very clever: browsers that refuse to embed the Dart VM will be running Dart > code more slowly than those that do, thereby providing a strong incentive to > support the VM. > > -- > Cédric > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
